PublicThe Casey Report, formally the National Audit on Group-based Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse,
is now available from the .gov.uk website in both PDF and HTML formats. Including notes and references it runs to nearly 200 pages, so I haven't yet read it all, but I shall when I have the time to do so properly. I have looked at the foreword, the executive summary, Baroness Casey's personal note and the bullet-point list of recommendations.
Inevitably the question of ethnicity will dominate the media, and that is addressed. Baroness Casey is very clear that ethnicity data on offenders
must be collected, something which at the moment is widely not happening. "Questions about ethnicity have been asked but dodged for years" is a direct quote from her foreword (p. 4). Yes, this aspect absolutely will be (and has already been) extensively exploited by far-right racists, but it is not acceptable to use that as an excuse to avoid looking too hard. It's somewhat reminiscent of the reluctance in the past to investigate abuse by Roman Catholic priests in both Britain and Ireland on the grounds that doing so might stir up anti-Catholic sentiment. That was wrong. So has been this.
There are a frightening number of other phrases that jump out even in the portion of the report I have yet read. For example, from Baroness Casey's personal note: she mentions that when she conducted an inspection of Rotherham Council in 2016,
Alexis Jay ensured that South Yorkshire Police were removed from oversight of the investigation as they had been "incompetent at best - sometimes turning a blind eye but often actively enabling abuse - and corrupt at worst" (p. 11). The large number of girls¹ who have been actively painted as complicit or even criminal accomplices to their own abuse is terrifying.
¹ And a significantly smaller but still far from zero number of boys.The Baroness's recommendations will be challenging for politicians, and so they should be.¹ For example, she recommends that the current "two-stage" criminalisation of men having sex with under-16s should be replaced with making rape the standard offence. To avoid criminalising teenagers in relationships with each other, she says a "Romeo and Juliet" (close-in-age) clause should also be introduced. This is pretty much the legal situation in France, barring their age of consent being 15. People in Britain often bandy about the term "statutory rape", but the law at present in this country is not actually as clear as that phrase makes it sound. This recommendation would make it so.
¹ The Home Secretary has said the government will implement them all. I'll believe it when I see it.Both the last UK government and the current one have behaved terribly on this issue. The Tories did nothing of note to investigate the scandals during their decade in power, yet now pretend it's all Keir Starmer's fault; Labour only recently insisted that those calling for a new statutory inquiry risked "amplifying the far right", yet
the PM announced exactly that two days ago. A risk now is that this new inquiry will take so long to report that it will be a convenient way for politicians of all parties to kick any kind of justice for the abused children into the long grass yet
again. Look at how compensation for subpostmasters is
still being held up by probably deliberate delaying tactics for a recent precedent.
Finally, it is absolutely clear that the legal system in general in this country has been desperately underfunded for years, under governments of various colours. Even serious criminal cases can take ages to come to court, and this emboldens some to think that they can effectively get away with wrong-doing. As the saying goes, justice delayed is justice denied. The children who have lived with the abuse and its after-effects for years are absolutely reasonable to consider that they have been denied justice. Baroness Casey's report does, and one hopes the new inquiry will, at least acknowledge that -- but they do not remove that failure.